Alec Difrawi Unethical Attorney Disbarred In Florida
Complaint
Phil Villaronga
Country: United States
Attorneys are like law enforcement have perhaps the most difficult job in interacting with the public. They get see the worse society has to offer. Damn if they do or damn if the do not. They are at times in a catch 20 situation.
Attorney Thomas A. Sadaka, hired by Alec Difrawi who later settled with the FTC on charges of deceptive business practices aggressively prosecuted bloggers having full knowledge of Mr. Difrawi business practices. The irony is Mr. Sadaka has ended up being disbarred by the Florida Bar. Below is a link to the Florida Bar Association:
https://www.floridabar.org/directories/find-mbr/profile/?num=915890
This should put on notice Attorneys who knowingly accept to prosecute blogger knowing that the First Amendment protect bloggers. This is the Constitutional Rights of every citizens of the United States.
Attorney Thomas A. Sadaka, hired by Alec Difrawi who later settled with the FTC on charges of deceptive business practices aggressively prosecuted bloggers having full knowledge of Mr. Difrawi business practices. The irony is Mr. Sadaka has ended up being disbarred by the Florida Bar. Below is a link to the Florida Bar Association:
https://www.floridabar.org/directories/find-mbr/profile/?num=915890
This should put on notice Attorneys who knowingly accept to prosecute blogger knowing that the First Amendment protect bloggers. This is the Constitutional Rights of every citizens of the United States.
Comments
Florida Judicial Code of Conduct says: Rule 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
http://www.afn.org/~afn54735/ethics1.html
_____________________________
Rule 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT
A lawyer shall not:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyers' honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice--
Comment: --Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of these characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, or breach of trust or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation.
Florida Jurisprudence 2d, Attorneys At Law (1994), Sec. 79, States:
Generally, any conduct of a lawyer which brings into scorn and disrepute the administration of justice constitutes misconduct demanding condemnation and appropriate penalties. The Rules of Discipline set forth in the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar provide that commission by a lawyer of any act that is unlawful or contrary to honesty and justice, whether the act is committed in the course of the attorney's relations as an attorney or otherwise, whether committed within or without the State of Florida, and whether a felony or misdemeanor, may constitute a cause for discipline.
https://efactssc-public.flcourts.org/CaseDocu ... 21_EXHIBITS.pdf
Thomas A. Sadaka is as guilty as Alec Difrawi and along with Difrawi co-conspirators in posting FRAUDULENT JOBS ONLINE and filing FRAUDENT LAWSUITS against bloggers. Some bloggers are fixtures online as a result of Alec Difrawi lawsuits. They are Archie Garga-Richardson, CEO/Founder of scamFRAUDalert, Investigative Reporter of Canada Les Henderson, and Tabatha Marshall of Phishing Bucket Blog.
These three bloggers refused to submit to Difrawi threats and intimidation (business practices) which includes Attorneys, private investigators, Ddos attacks and a host of criminal activities. In all earnestly, Attorney Thomas A. Sadaka should not be reinstated. He does not adhere to the Florida Bar Association Oath taken as an Attorney.
____________________________________
What is Ddos Attacks?
In computing, a denial-of-service attack (DoS attack) is a cyber-attack in which the perpetrator seeks to make a machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by temporarily or indefinitely disrupting services of a host connected to the Internet. Denial of service is typically accomplished by flooding the targeted machine or resource with superfluous requests in an attempt to overload systems and prevent some or all legitimate requests from being fulfilled.[1]
In a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS attack), the incoming traffic flooding the victim originates from many different sources. This effectively makes it impossible to stop the attack simply by blocking a single source.
A DoS or DDoS attack is analogous to a group of people crowding the entry door of a shop, making it hard for legitimate customers to enter, disrupting trade.
Criminal perpetrators of DoS attacks often target sites or services hosted on high-profile web servers such as banks or credit card payment gateways. Revenge, blackmail[2][3][4] and activism[5] can motivate the
https://myeclerk.myorangeclerk.com/Cases/search
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article221890640.html