Extortion: Noipmail.com Alexander Yanai 1, Petach Tikva
Complaint
Fred
Country: United States
Extortion: Noipmail.com Alexander Yanai 1, Petach Tikva
I used this service and when I did something that they thought they could use against me. I go an email demanding money or the info would be made public.
Beware!!!!
I used this service and when I did something that they thought they could use against me. I go an email demanding money or the info would be made public.
Beware!!!!
Comments
If they are doing anything to you here is the abuse email of their upstream abuse@zahav.net.il
#1,865,886 position in world sites rating
IP Address:
192.117.155.28
noipmail.com Reviews and Comments
Hide Map »
noipmail.com Website Registration WHOIS Details
Hide Info »
IP Location: Internet Usage Statistics IsraelIsrael, Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv
Resolve Host: noipmail.com
Hosting Company / IP Owner: Smile Internet Gold - Adsl Fixed Ip S
Owner IP Range: 192.117.155.0 - 192.117.155.255 IP Range Whois for 192.117.155.28
Owner Address: Alexander Yanai 1, Petach Tikva
Owner Country: Internet Usage Statistics IsraelIsrael
Owner Website: www.noipmail.com
Owner CIDR: 192.117.155.0/24
IP Address Change History:
Noipmail.com Website used IP Addresses -
192.116.227.130 (noipmail.com) used on 25 October 2012
192.117.155.28 (noipmail.com) used on 28 February 2013
84.228.83.8 (IGLD-84-228-83-8.inter.net.il) used on 02 April 2013
84.229.137.170 (IGLD-84-229-137-170.inter.net.il) used on 05 April 2013
... ... ... Found: 6 ip addresses ... ... more »
192.117.155.28 - site using this IP address now
Smile Internet Gold
And about Ofer Sadot, the owner of noipmail, what I read about his reent arrest was that he tried to raise 3 million $$ to promote his spam project and then he was threatening reporters that reported about his past affairs with the law (being the first Israeli forbidden to access the internet by court order on account of a denial of service attack on an ISP that blocked his outgoing spam, serving time in jail for hacking the tax software etc.) and accused them of casing him the loss of $3000000 because people read what they wrote about him. Anther funny thing I read about him is that when he was serving time for some of the officers in charge of him brought their computers to him so he can "fix" them.
By Benny Run | February 11, 1999
Page 1 of 1
Can an Israeli court prohibit a citizen from surfing the Web? Apparently so and the decision is creating a storm on the popular Web forums in Israel.
On Jan. 21, Judge Rachel Greenberg of the Tel Aviv Magistrate Court issued a precedential order against Ofer Sadot, who operates business Web sites, prohibiting him from connecting to the Internet for 60 days.
Authorities say Sadot sent spam mail via a small Israeli ISP named Aquanet and caused its server to crash. Aquanet, whose complaint to the police resulted in the order, claims that Sadot did so as revenge against the company when it decided to sever its business ties with him. Aquanet said Sadot disrupted its network by sending more traffic than the system could handle.
However, according to Sadot, within five minutes, any child can cause the crash of a network provider's server if it is small and disorganized. His requirements were greater than Aquanet was able to supply. He claims that he was acting under the terms of his agreement. Sadot has since moved to a larger provider.
802.11ac Action Plan: A Network-Readiness Checklist
Download Now
"Can the Israel Electric Company cause the Postal Authority to come to a standstill when it sends millions of bills?" asked Sadot, who does not understand why the restraining order was issued. He claimed that if indeed he caused any disruption or interference, Aquanet could sue him in civil court or disconnect him, but a restraining order was not called for.
During the court proceedings, Yuval Arel, the police representative, said that it is not illegal to spam, but overloading the system is a crime because it clogs up the system. In answer to another question whether or not a crash is a question of system capacity, the police representative replied that it was and added that so far no complaints had been received from other larger providers.
Arel quoted two judicial rulings from the U.S., involving such restraining orders: A verdict prohibiting connection in perpetuity to the Internet against a person convicted of child pornography and a verdict prohibiting connection for five years against a person convicted of fencing stolen goods over the Web. There is also an FBI decision, he said, according to which Internet offenders will be obliged to submit to monitoring of their Internet activities.
The Israeli Computers Law passed in 1995 defines a computer criminal as one who disrupts the regular operation of a computer, interferes with its use, inserts false information, accesses data in the computer without authorization or with intent to commit another offence, or infects a computer with a virus. Illegal disruption of normal computer operation is a civil offence.
"The law, however, does not anticipate the complexity of the Internet and the speed of its development," says Judith Knoller, an attorney involved in the case.
It is possible that overloading a computer may constitute disruption of its normal functioning and may therefore be an offence against the Computers Law, but does all overloading necessarily result in its disruption?
"It is not clear what constitutes overloading and who determines its extent," she said.
Sadot's attorney, Eli Gur defines the action against his client as a "violation of rights to free movement."
"In the same way that it is not possible to prohibit a person from walking on the sidewalk," Gur said, "it is not possible to prohibit anyone from surfing the Web."
An appeal has been made against the verdict at Tel Aviv's District Court.