Digital Star unauthorized charge
Complaint
Steve
Country: United States
A preauthorization for $74.95 from Digital Star with a bad phone number (208-123-7377) showed up on my debit card account 1/29/12. Called bank fraud department and had the account killed immediately. They stopped the charge since it had not completed. Do not know who Digital Star is or what the charge was for. I use the card for online purchases mainly through Amazon. No purchases in the last 30 dqays. However, I placed orders in the last 60 days from a company called Turncraft (woodworking plans), Personal Creations, and Entirely Pets. I wonder what companies others have used recently.
Comments
The card issued to me was the same acct. no. with a new expiration date. If the scammers had my old card info, they could have guessed the new expiration date if the first time through was declined, otherwise whoever issued the card had the security breach. Amazon, Paypal and a couple other companies have this card info, but I had NOT updated the new expiration date with anyone.
The similarity I see from reading the responses is most people report it was a debit or bank issued card (as opposed to discover, amex, etc), although it seems there are a couple "credit" cards and 1 EFT(?).
http://www.fraudwatchinternational.com/fake-jobs/artlondon/
Bank of America flagged the purchase and reversed the charges.
Our credit union issued a credit when we filled out the fraud papers. It just posted to our account today. cancelled our card.
I wonder what we all have in common? Amazon? another vendor?
I have not ordered from them in years and it wasn't with the same card. This is obviously big. maybe people can try to figure out what we have in common.
called citibank, they said they'll reverse charges, but it's first time they have "digital star" reported
02/03/2012 Digital Star +442081 $74.95
My bank (MnT) won't do anything until the transaction clears. That really annoys me; why can't banks work together when suspicious merchant transactions are made and at least flag them for additional investigation rather then putting the onus on the customer.
For anyone keeping tabs my only non-grocery or gas usage of the card for the last few weeks was a single purchase from Amazon.
The thief doesn't care what each charge is for, although it might make more work. He's after all he can get, through whatever vulnerability he can exploit, and piped away to someplace safe from legal interference.
Even TSA procedures recognize this type of security policy vulnerability by adding entirely "random" more complete screens on top of the routine ones that usually keep the system flowing. It is not enough to ignore all fraud below some level, as a "cost of business" decision, or the thief will just make his charges evade your screen. At some point, you either have to recognize the overall pattern, or randomly sample and look deeper to make sure your policies aren't being gamed.
Don't banks forward fraud dispute information to them, or does that also depend on a threshold?
How many fraudulent charges occur against cards that are used on-line,
vs. those never used on-line?