Complaint

+1
Debra M. Persiano
Country: United States
I got a call today at home from a man stating he was a process server for Collin County DA's Office and he is with the Sheriff's office and needed to come serve a warrant on me.  I was shocked and asked why?  He stated do you live ....are you still at this address are you now at this address and I stated who are you?  He again, stated he was from the county going to serve court papers on me today. He gave me a toll free number for what he stated was the county's office which is 1 866.872.6116 gave me a case no. which he called a Cause No. 008307-TX. I called the number was transferred to a Mr. Fisher's office who stated that law suite in the amount of $6,214.24 was filed in Collin Co., Tx and that warrant was out for me.  He then after back and forth said let me get more information from my secretary and state this was for an outstanding debt in from Capital One a credit card that I obtained several years back and had disputes over interest charges etc.  He stated that if I did not want to go to court or jail that I could pay $1,951.00 in full by end of business today and this matter could be cleared up.  I explained that I recently lost my job etc.  Anyway, he stated that I needed to call him back by EOB today or they will serve the papers.  Ok, so that was a heads up for me.  I called the DA's office nothing is filed on me as of today, after searching PMG it is clear that they do not practice best practices for collections and have been in trouble for this before back in 2004.  I need someone to give me advise. I want to pay off my debt, I don't want this type of collections to continue this upset me, made my blood pressure raise, this type of collections are not the right thing to do.  Had they called and ask to make arrangements or give me an opportunity to clear the matter, rather then threaten me by taken legal action, or harassment stating they are sending a sheriff over today.  This is wrong, bad business, and should not continue this company is bad news.

Comments

123...174175176...183184185Next
  • 0
    Repeat
    I'm not saying its  unlikely... i'm just saying i never saw tampon commercials for REALLY SMALL tampons.  Come to think of it, i've never seen commercials for hampster erectile disfunction, birth control, or COPD.  Hmmm.  What the Hell is wrong with thinking about the hampsters?  What about the God Damned hampsters?!?!?!?
    • 0
      TiT Hunter
      Personally i enjoy a nice round full breast. The nipple cant be big. I dislike balony nipples.
    • 0
      help me
      I want to find Todd "the prosecutor" Shaw. Anyone know where he landed? Was fired by Jim trent a couple months ago, and I know he can't afford to drive out of the inland empire...
    • 0
      Found
      | 1 reply
      He is running 2 of his own offices now
      • 0
        could you email me replies to Found
        isthishfreddyherbert@aol.com any info you have about him
    • 0
      PI
      | 3 replies
      Pristine Loss Mitigation Inc., scammed a bunch of people and then "transferred" accounts to newly formed SCC Law Group, which stands for Rose Spellamn, Thomas Chapin and David Clark.  Thomas Chapin represents one of the dirt bags from the Rincon scam that was raided way back in 2011.  Anybody have any info on this newly formed "SCC Law Group".

      Also, attorney Paul St.Amant, recently disbarred for stealing from over a dozen clients.  He was closely associated with the Rincon scam, and filed BKs for Tina Goff and Rhonda Loop in 2013 (both of which were fraudulent).  His last address at 1 Ridgegate, Temecula, is in the same building as an office for another group of very nasty "Rincon" people. Anybody know of Mr. St.Amant's current adventures? Do they involve Wayne Lunsford and relatives?
      • 0
        Any connections? replies to PI
        | 2 replies
        Website registered in March.
        http://www.whois.com/whois/scclawgroup.com
        Looks like they present themselves as consumer attorneys.

        Google phone number:
        http://www.golocal247.com/biz/scc-law-group/corona-ca/LOC697762285
        "SCC Law Group
        2280 Wardlow Circle suite 255,
        CORONA, CA 92880
        www.scclawgroup.com
        Phone: 951-280-1313
        ..."

        http://www.superpages.com/bp/Corona-CA/Jack-Law-Group-L0509289573.htm
        "Jack Law Group
        200 S Main St Ste 300, Corona, CA 92882
        http://www.owalliance.com
        (951) 280-1313
        ..."
        So, what is "One World Alliance"?  Looks like another boilerplate website.
        Or is the phone number an answering service/mail drop?

        http://www.whocalled.co/951-280-1313.html
        "(951) 280-1313 is a landline phone number at 200 S Main Street # 300 Corona, CA 92882 and phone carrier is Pacific Bell. Owner’s name and address below.
        Owner’s name: National Mitigation Service
        Location: 200 S Main Street # 300 Corona, CA 92882
        ..."

        Desist and Refrain Order from CA Dept. of Real Estate, to a Robert Campoy, Andres Martinez, and One World Alliance Inc, dba National Mitigation Services.
        http://www.dre.ca.gov/files/pdf/loanmods/H4467SD.pdf
        • 0
          PI replies to Any connections?
          | 1 reply
          Thanks for the research on SCC Law Group, but I had most of that.  I was looking for names of employees of SCC Law Group, i.e. is this just Pristine Loss Mitigation renamed; are any Rincon scammers involved, etc.

          As for your reference to Jack Law, One Alliance and National Mitigation, I'm not drawing a connection to either the SCC Law Group or the other matter, Paul St.Amant....am I missing something?

          Thanks again.
          • 0
            Only saw.. replies to PI
            that there was a cluster of similar operations historically tied to the same phone number.

            Mainly, I wanted to see if the typical complaint pattern showed up on 800notes.

            Continuity in phone numbers (and possibly Experian/Accurint accounts) has shown up in other resurrected Corona operations.  The names keep changing, but sometimes the phone numbers stay the same, or connect related "offices" via complaints under a common phone number on 800notes.

            There is a past pattern of both "debt negotiation service" and "debt collection" with B&L.
            Might just be a local answering service.

            "St. Amant" showed up in one of the B&L websites at the time of the FTC raids, with boilerplate construction similar to their other later batch of sites.  I think FTC may have taken emails with their website developer about it.  Might be in the docs they filed with the court, visible on Pacer.  Not sure to what degree Paul St. Amant was/is involved.
    • 0
      GET A LIFE
      "WASTED TIME"

      Well baby, there you stand
      With your little head, down in your hand
      Oh, my God, you can't believe it's happening again
      Your baby's gone, and you're all alone
      And it looks like the end.

      And you're back out on the street.
      And you're tryin' to remember.
      How do you start it over?
      You don't know if you can.
      You don't care much for a stranger's touch,
      But you can't hold your man.

      You never thought you'd be alone this far down the line
      And I know what's been on your mind
      You're afraid it's all been wasted time

      The autumn leaves have got you thinking about the first time that you fell
      You didn't love the boy too much, no, no, you just loved the boy too well,
      Farewell
      So you live from day to day, and you dream about tomorrow, oh.
      And the hours go by like minutes and the shadows come to stay
      So you take a little something to make them go away
      And I could have done so many things, baby
      If I could only stop my mind from wonderin' what
      I left behind and from worrying 'bout this wasted time

      Oh, another love has come and gone
      Oh, and the years keep rushing on
      I remember what you told me before you went out on your own:
      "Sometimes to keep it together, we got to leave it alone."
      So you can get on with your search, baby, and I can get on with mine
      And maybe someday we will find , that it wasn't really wasted time
      Mm, hm
      Oh hoo, ooh, oh,
      Ooh, ooh, mm
    • 0
      sam
      Civil Harassment
      In general, civil harassment is abuse, threats of abuse, stalking, sexual assault, or serious harassment by someone you have not dated and do NOT have a close family relationship with, like a neighbor, a roommate, or a friend (that you have never dated). It is also civil harassment if the abuse is from a family member that is not included in the list under domestic violence. So, for example, if the abuse is from an uncle or aunt, a niece or nephew, or a cousin, it is considered civil harassment and NOT domestic violence.
      The civil harassment laws say “harassment” is:

      Unlawful violence, like assault or battery or stalking, OR
      A credible threat of violence, AND
      The violence or threats seriously scare, annoy, or harass someone and there is no valid reason for it.
      “Credible threat of violence” means intentionally saying something or acting in a way that would make a reasonable person afraid for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family. A “credible threat of violence” includes following or stalking someone or making harassing calls or sending harassing messages (by phone, mail, or e-mail) over a period of time (even if it is a short time).

      Read about the law in Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6.

      Workplace Violence
      For a workplace violence situation, the harassment is defined in the same way as for civil harassment. The difference is that the harassment happens primarily at work AND it is the employer of the harassed employee who asks for protection for the employee (and, if necessary, for the employee’s family).

      For an employer to get a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of an employee, there needs to be reasonable proof that:

      The employee has suffered unlawful violence (like assault, battery or stalking) or a credible threat of violence;
      The unlawful violence or the threat of violence can reasonably be construed to be carried out or to have been carried out at the workplace;
      The conduct is not allowable as part of a legitimate labor dispute; and
      The person accused is not engaged in constitutionally protected activity.
      Read about the law in Code of Civil Procedure section 527.8.
    • 0
      sam
      Civil Harassment
      In general, civil harassment is abuse, threats of abuse, stalking, sexual assault, or serious harassment by someone you have not dated and do NOT have a close family relationship with, like a neighbor, a roommate, or a friend (that you have never dated). It is also civil harassment if the abuse is from a family member that is not included in the list under domestic violence. So, for example, if the abuse is from an uncle or aunt, a niece or nephew, or a cousin, it is considered civil harassment and NOT domestic violence.
      The civil harassment laws say “harassment” is:

      Unlawful violence, like assault or battery or stalking, OR
      A credible threat of violence, AND
      The violence or threats seriously scare, annoy, or harass someone and there is no valid reason for it.
      “Credible threat of violence” means intentionally saying something or acting in a way that would make a reasonable person afraid for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family. A “credible threat of violence” includes following or stalking someone or making harassing calls or sending harassing messages (by phone, mail, or e-mail) over a period of time (even if it is a short time).

      Read about the law in Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6.

      Workplace Violence
      For a workplace violence situation, the harassment is defined in the same way as for civil harassment. The difference is that the harassment happens primarily at work AND it is the employer of the harassed employee who asks for protection for the employee (and, if necessary, for the employee’s family).

      For an employer to get a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of an employee, there needs to be reasonable proof that:

      The employee has suffered unlawful violence (like assault, battery or stalking) or a credible threat of violence;
      The unlawful violence or the threat of violence can reasonably be construed to be carried out or to have been carried out at the workplace;
      The conduct is not allowable as part of a legitimate labor dispute; and
      The person accused is not engaged in constitutionally protected activity.
      Read about the law in Code of Civil Procedure section 527.8.
    • 0
      TIM MILLER
      oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements, such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease or being unable to perform one's occupation, are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much as if not more than printed publications.oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements, such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease or being unable to perform one's occupation, are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much as if not more than printed publications.oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another, which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements, such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease or being unable to perform one's occupation, are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much as if not more than printed publications.
    • 0
      Bella Donna
      Freedom to give
      Freedom to live
      Freedom to question why

      Freedom to walk
      Freedom to talk
      Freedom to live or to die

      Freedom to sing
      Freedom to swing
      Freedom to just walk on by

      Freedom to speak
      Freedom to seek
      Freedom to laugh or to cry

      Freedom to work
      Freedom to shirk
      Freedom to spend or to buy

      Freedom to please
      Freedom to tease
      Freedom to smile or to sigh

      Freedom to be
      Freedom to see
      Freedom to aspire so high

      Freedom to touch
      Freedom to clutch
      Freedom to grant or deny

      Freedom that’s mine
      Freedom divine
      Freedom no money can buy
      Freedom to give
      Freedom to live
      Freedom to question why

      Freedom to walk
      Freedom to talk
      Freedom to live or to die

      Freedom to sing
      Freedom to swing
      Freedom to just walk on by

      Freedom to speak
      Freedom to seek
      Freedom to laugh or to cry

      Freedom to work
      Freedom to shirk
      Freedom to spend or to buy

      Freedom to please
      Freedom to tease
      Freedom to smile or to sigh

      Freedom to be
      Freedom to see
      Freedom to aspire so high

      Freedom to touch
      Freedom to clutch
      Freedom to grant or deny

      Freedom that’s mine
      Freedom divine
      Freedom no money can buy
    • 0
      xsd
      Sexual orientation is an enduring personal quality that inclines people to feel romantic or sexual attraction (or a combination of these) to persons of the opposite sex or gender, the same sex or gender, or to both sexes or more than one gender. These attractions are generally subsumed under heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality,[1][2] while asexuality (the lack of sexual attraction to others) is sometimes identified as the fourth category.[3][4][5][6] These categories are aspects of the more nuanced nature of sexual identity.[1] For example, people may use other labels, such as pansexual or polysexual,[7] or none at all.[1] According to the American Psychological Association, sexual orientation "also refers to a person's sense of identity based on those attractions, related behaviors, and membership in a community of others who share those attractions".[1][8]

      The term sexual preference largely overlaps with sexual orientation, but is generally distinguished in psychological research.[9] A person who identifies as bisexual, for example, may sexually prefer one sex over the other.[10] Sexual preference may also suggest a degree of voluntary choice,[9][11][12] whereas the scientific consensus is that sexual orientation is not a choice.[13][14][15]

      There is no consensus among scientists about why a person develops a particular sexual orientation;[1] however, biologically-based theories for the cause of sexual orientation are favored by experts,[16] which point to genetic factors, the early uterine environment, or both combinations.[14] Moreover, there is no substantive evidence which suggests parenting or early childhood experiences play a role when it comes to sexual orientation;[14] when it comes to same-sex sexual behavior, shared or familial environment plays no role for men and minor role for women.[17] Research over several decades has demonstrated that sexual orientation ranges along a continuum, from exclusive attraction to the opposite sex to exclusive attraction to the same sex.[1]

      While sexual orientation is reported primarily within biology and psychology, including sexology, for reports within anthropology and history, including social constructionism, there are other explanations that relate to sexual orientation and culture.
    • 0
      SUDS N DUDS
      "Dirty Laundry"

      I make my living off the evening news
      Just give me something
      Something I can use
      People love it when you lose
      They love dirty laundry

      Well, I coulda been an actor
      But I wound up here
      I just have to look good
      I don't have to be clear
      Come and whisper in my ear
      Give us dirty laundry

      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em when they're down
      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em when they're down

      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em when they're down
      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em all around

      We got the bubble headed
      Bleached blonde
      Comes on at five
      She can tell you 'bout the plane crash
      With a gleam in her eye
      It's interesting when people die
      Give us dirty laundry

      Can we film the operation
      Is the head dead yet
      You know the boys in the newsroom
      Got a running bet
      Get the widow on the set
      We need dirty laundry

      [Instrumental Interlude]

      You don't really need to find out
      What's going on
      You don't really want to know
      Just how far it's gone
      Just leave well enough alone
      Eat your dirty laundry

      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em when they're down
      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em when they're down

      Kick 'em when they're up
      Kick 'em when they're down
      Kick 'em when they're stiff
      Kick 'em all around

      (Kick 'em when they're up)
      (Kick 'em when they're down)
      (Kick 'em when they're up)
      (Kick 'em when they're down)

      (Kick 'em when they're up)
      (Kick 'em when they're down)
      (Kick 'em when they're stiff)
      (Kick 'em all around)

      Dirty little secrets
      Dirty little lies
      We got our dirty little fingers
      In everybody's pie
      We love to cut you down to size
      We love dirty laundry

      We can do the Innuendo
      We can dance and sing
      When it's said and done
      We haven't told you a thing
      We all know that Crap is King
      Give us dirty laundry
    • 0
      PI
      | 2 replies
      To the person who provided the info/research, thank you for the clarification, I do see the pattern with the numbers now.  I will follow up.

      As for St.Amant, their was multiple references to him in the FTC docs, including references made in the declaration of Michael Huck filed with the FTC on April 2, 2014 (doc no. 315-1, attachment to an FTC pleading).  Now that Mr. St.Amant is disbarred, I assumed he would fall in with the former owners of the Rincon scam, and since he filed BKs for Rhonda Loop and Tina Goff, this is a good indicator.
    123...174175176...183184185Next

    Post a new comment