Digital Star unauthorized charge

Complaint

0
Steve
Country: United States
A preauthorization for $74.95 from Digital Star with a bad phone number (208-123-7377) showed up on my debit card account 1/29/12.  Called bank fraud department and had the account killed immediately.  They stopped the charge since it had not completed.  Do not know who Digital Star is or what the charge was for.  I use the card for online purchases mainly through Amazon.  No purchases in the last 30 dqays.  However, I placed orders in the last 60 days from a company called Turncraft (woodworking plans), Personal Creations, and Entirely Pets. I wonder what companies others have used recently.

Comments

  • 0
    Michelle
    | 3 replies
    I just checked my account this morning and I see that a charge of $ 149.99 was charged on my account on 2/14/12 by Digital Star.  I have never heard of these people or used them before! I use Union First Market Bank. Now I have to wait to see if it clears the account to file a fradulent report.  Seems unfair to me, the money has already been taken out of my account but I have to wait to get it back.  But according to the bank it's "pending" and has not posted but funny it has taken away from my balance!  This is ridiculous!
    • 0
      tj replies to Michelle
      | 2 replies
      Is the charge via your debit card, or directly to your checking account?

      If via your debit card, have your bank block the card number, and do NOT issue or activate a new one.
      Only request an ATM card requiring a PIN, and use only credit cards for online or retail purchases.

      If the banks are systematically failing to protect your money accessed through debit cards, then stop using debit cards.
      • 0
        Michelle replies to tj
        | 1 reply
        Yes, it was via my debit card.  I had the card closed as soon as I saw the charge.  I typically pay for online purchases through Paypal.
        • 0
          tj replies to Michelle
          Then any merchant you pay by Paypal would not have obtained your debit card, but a Paypal money transfer link.

          That argues against any of the online merchants you paid via Paypal as a target of a hack.
  • 0
    Mike
    The $149.99 charge happened to me also. On Valentine's Day of all days.
  • 0
    Ryab
    149.99 - called immediately, card canceled but I have to wait for the charge to post? so dumb.
  • 0
    Lee
    Also got me for $149.99 on Feb. 13. Reported to bank as soon as I saw it and cancelled card. This seems to be ramping up so I'm not sure if the banks have managed to figure out how to stop this yet. I bank with RBC Bank USA, though they are in the process of merging with PNC.
  • 0
    Pastorarchman
    | 1 reply
    Same thing BOA  in Georgia.  Yesterday the 14th.  $149.99.
    • 0
      tj replies to Pastorarchman
      Looks like all the recent fraudulent charges are at the new $149,99 amount.
  • 0
    Joe from Chicago
    I too had a charge of $74.95 from Digital Star +4420812373 on 08 Feb 2012.

    I visited my Chase branch in person, and had a very nice talk with my bank representative.

    We cancelled the card, provided me with a temp ATM card and new card coming in 7/10 days.  I filled out a fraud affidavit on the spot and should have my funds re-deposited within three days.  It was painless.

    They had not heard of this scam by Digital Star and it was only through my complaint that alerted them.

    It appears that I caught this in time, but it will be a hassle to re-establish accounts with vendors. But....it's a numbers game.  How many have not disputed this charge and not even looked at their statements? - letting the scum get away with this crime.  I appreciate reading about others woes regarding this and contribute.

    Joe
  • 0
    Nico
    | 1 reply
    Did any of you ever use Priceline.com anytime before or around the time you got this charge?? It happening in beantown too :-(
    • 0
      Bridget K replies to Nico
      I used pricelince about a year ago to book my honeymoon. What card did you use?
  • 0
    Lesley from South Carolina
    This happened to me yesterday, a charge for $149.99 from Digital Star with a bad phone number went through and was approved by my bank (Wells Fargo) the item was listed as"DEBIT CRD PURCHASE 02/14 Digital Star +44208123 +442081237377" on my account.  I called my bank to notify them that it was a fraudulent charge and was interrogated about the charge and basically told it would be 5-7 days till they put the money back in my account and even then it was temporary until they found out for sure if it was a fraudulent charge.  They said that Digital Star was listed as a "theater/ticket agent" type merchant.  I very rarely buy anything online, the last time was probably some time last year.  I always use my card as a debit card & not a credit card. It looks like this is a pretty recently started scam and I hope that someone does something about it before it gets more widespread.  I work hard for my money and will absolutely press charges if they can find the person or company that is doing this!
  • 0
    mark
    I was hit for $149.99 this morning 2/16/2012  at 8:45am. This is not victimless crime. I wish the banks had something in place that anytime a order was placed over seas that automatic security protocols went into action, like a computer generated phone call asking if these said charges are valid. Or the "processing companies" had something  similar in place. But that would be too much to asked.
    I am just thinking of the unfornuate people who are of very limited means and their last $74.99 or more is ripped out of their account without their consent.
  • 0
    Blanca
    I also had a charge from Digital Star +442081 +44 02/14Digital S $149.99!! I also have an account with me debit card info saved on Amazon! I'm so thankful for your post about this! Thankfully my bank was able to give me a credit for the amount of the charge. But it is so frustrating to be out of 150 bucks!! UGH!!!
  • 0
    Bean
    I just saw the charge for 149.99 hit my debit account dated for 2/15.  Tried to call the number and it was a voicemail in England.442081237377

    Trying to cancel the card and reverse the transaction also.  We do buy from Amazon but not recently.  We do use the card regularly to book rooms on Priceline though.
  • 0
    Diane
    Yup, just got the same $149.99 charge on my new(ish) Citi Visa card, which I rarely use.  I don't know how they got the number but I canceled the card.   And I'm not impressed with Citi for failing to notice that I don't live in the UK and haven't reported any travel...
  • 0
    tj
    | 2 replies
    The pattern of complaints, with a wide range of different banks and credit unions reported, and a wide range of usage patterns, including many reporting Amazon and online usage but also many unused or seldom used cards, suggests that the card information is being obtained by "pinging", basically trying blocks of card numbers and expiration dates until they get a hit.

    The diversity of cards and usage patterns argues against a hack as the source of card information.

    They don't need the CCV number to run through a charge, so the exp. date guessing odds aren't bad if you can test them quickly for free.  

    No one has reported any attempt by this "business" to dispute, or even respond to, their fraud disputes, as a legitimate business that actually sold something might.

    The charges themselves are going through the merchant account of a business, "digital star",  that supposedly just shut down.  They started showing up a couple days before they were supposedly "dissolved".  Recent reports are that the phone number is not in service.

    Additional evidence of "pinging" has shown up in a complaint reporting $1 Amazon charges showing up against 3 cards on one day, then disappearing, followed by the standard larger charges the next day from "digital star".  The $1 charges are the "ping", cancelled to leave less of a trail, with the money grabbing charges run through the unwatched defunct company account.

    Amazon "pinging", and exploiting a defunct company and its account, shows that you are dealing with someone capable of finding, recognizing, and exploiting merchant account weak security opportunities.  

    Similar skills could be used to find weakly secured sites to use for testing or "pinging" card information prior to the digital star charges.

    The victims with the least problems appear to be those with fraudulently charged credit cards.  Those with debit cards have bank dispute results ranging from immediate reversal of the charge, blocking the card with a new card issued, to money missing until they "investigate".

    This scam has shown that they are not secure, and the banks are doing little to secure the system against this type of attack.  They are treating each fraudulent charge separately, and not shutting off the fraudulent source.  This will expose unsuspecting consumers to substantial risk of fraud losses until the account is shut down.

    Do NOT activate debit cards, block any that you have, and do not activate replacement debit cards.  Obtain a PIN protected ATM card if you must, but use only credit cards for online or retail purchases, as the federal fraud protections are stronger.
    • 0
      Bridget K replies to tj
      | 1 reply
      TJ not everyone can get credit cards. My husband and I don't have enough credit to even be eligable for credit cards. My bank uses mastercard and his walmart money card is visa.
      • 0
        tj replies to Bridget K
        I realize that many people may not have that choice.

        My advice is only, if you have a choice, vote with your money.

        Look after your own interests, rather than just blindly believing the bank advertising as they pitch their debit card products.


        The banks have sold the whole concept of debit cards to the general public as "safe", supposedly preferable to credit cards without actually delivering on their promises.  (Why?  "Because you all need our help to manage your finances?"),  They prefer debit cards because they are more profitable, to them.  They were even more profitable before the debit card merchant fees were reduced recently.

        They have been lax with following up on fraud and security breaches with credit cards, but there the damages largely affected their own profits, so they just balanced the costs of better fraud follow-up against the actual losses, and made a business decisions to tolerate some level of ignored fraud, both in their own fraud departments, and by their peers, other banks and payment processors.

        Here, they are pushing more of the risk and loss onto the consumer, even as they pitch the product as "safe".  The criminals know their system vulnerabilities, and are gaming their fraud policies, adjusting the level of fraudulent charges to fly under the radar of the bank fraud policies, diversifying the range of banks they send charges through to limit visibility in one place, creating the appearance that the fraudulent charges are merchant errors through some real business, etc.

        With their current policies, the banks are selling a defective product with false and misleading advertising while maximizing their own profits but ignoring the very real collective consumer risk of fraud loss created by their fraud policies.

Post a new comment