no reply over a week's time period
Complaint
james pagoota
Country: United States
I emailed you twice since 05/09/11 that I had processed a case#381=400733 and acquired for the client 1567.00 of his 2700.00! The rest of the money goes to his former spouse Michelle H. Colligan same case# I wish to process her refund but it is no longer listed as a prospective client in the system! I wished re-instatement for this case#! I have not heard anything from you even though you advise I should hear from you within 24 to 48 hours! Get with it please! James Pagoota
Comments
A tactic that is often used to attack a person's self-confidence and to induce self-doubt is to ask a question using an ambiguity, when the person answers with a deduction or guess, a negative wrong or no is indicated and a more accurate re-question is provided with the correct answer. This is done repetitively to induce self-doubt and attack a person's self-confidence by having them believe that their conclusions or deductions are always false
Event or Action -> Interpretation of Event -> Reinforcement of Interpretation
An event or reality -> interpretation of this event or reality -> reinforcement of interpretation and view on reality
In the workplace, employees who are psychologically harassed or psychologically tortured are often described as having the wrong interpretation of events, or having a "perception problem", a "bad attitude", and the wrong view of reality. They are then asked to consult a medical professional, a psychiatrist, and are then usually subsequently discredited and classified as having a psychological problem or mental illness.
You may have seen this in the media where something will happen, the media will interpret it in a way that is false according to other media groups or to your understanding of events and evidence, and will then proceed to try to reinforce their view and interpretation on reality or events and evidence.
Conflicting countries or organizations will often use what is called propaganda and their media to interpret their view on reality and events. For example the media in the US, Russia, Europe, China, and Asia may all have different interpretations of events and views on reality that they wish to induce in their audience.
Controlling a victim's source of information and interpreting reality and events for the victim is also part of brainwashing technologies. An example of brainwashing and psychological attacks is Fear of Fear and Attacks to the Honor. A victim will be lead to believe that the fight-or-flight response is fear, they are then threatened which results in the fight-or-flight response, which is interpreted as fear, you were scared (showing fear to your enemy), and the victim's honor is then attacked. Degrading Themes
Interpretations and evidence are not the same. For example if the interpretation of events is that Julius Caesar throw himself on the knifes of the Senators several times, that would contradict the evidence, so ignorance, intelligence, and the ability to interpret the events and evidence correctly and deduce the right view on reality is key and a factor.
Some people may feel that the feeling or emotion of fear attacks their honor. Fear is usually used to attack a person's honor, ego, and self-confidence..
A tactic that is sometimes used, is to lead the victim to believe that to feel threatened, and the resulting fight-or-flight response, is fear. Therefore the more threatened they feel equals more fear. This tactic deceives the victim and attacks them in two ways. The first is to threaten them, causing the fight-or-flight response, and the second is to simply feel threatened attacks their honor, which results in a chain reaction of an increasing threat. This response results in social withdrawal where the victim tries to avoid threatening situations or public areas.
The way this is usually used is to make the victim believe that to feel threatened, and the fight-or-flight response, is fear. The visible signs of the body having the fight-of-light response, like adrenaline, are therefore signs of fear that show the individuals or the enemy threatening them that they are scared. This belief is used to attack the victim's honor and the victim can be repetitively humiliated this way.
Movies or Audio that projects fear or the emotion of fear can also affect an individual.
In the circle of warriors, to experience fear and still destroy your enemies makes you even braver and increases your honor
Fear-of-humiliation is linked or similar to fear-of-fear but different.
• Fear-of-fear is about fearing fear itself because to feel fear results in an attack to the person's honor, which can result in humiliation.
• Fear-of-humiliation is fearing humiliation or being humiliated.
In both cases the person or victim can become aversive to situations or the possibility of being fearful or humiliated, usually through repetitive psychological attacks in public places. The result is that the victim can become aversive to public places, which can result in isolation
A stressful situation and tactic that is sometimes used to induce stress in a person is to give a person full responsibility for a department, for example, but the control to make changes or take action is given to someone else. This can have the effect of making the person insecure or feel vulnerable because they have no control over what they are fully responsible or accountable for, and it also places them at the "mercy" of someone else that can harm their career
People can be led to believe things that are false in order to manipulate them and even to try to drive them to suicide or to harm others.
For example a person can be led to believe that they are about to be fired or constantly on the verge of being fired to induce stress, paranoia, and insecurity. Another example is to lead the person to believe that they will be sued or going bankrupt, will be falsely accused resulting in prison time, will never be employed again, or lose their spouse.
Some victims may not understand why someone would do this to them or how some people can do this to others, what the motives are for doing this to them, and therefore can be deceived into believing the phenomenon is of beneficial intentions.
The phenomenon of psychological harassment or warfare can also leave the victims in doubt or confused as to what is going on or what is the intention or purpose of these psychological manipulations, psychological attacks, and events in question are for. Are the intentions in some way benevolent for training purposes or self improvement. It can also leave the victim unaware that a psychological war is being waged on them and the doubt, confusion, and deception can result in preventing the victims from taking action or fighting back.
• It's a test.
• It's training.
• It's to make you stronger or tougher.
• It's an initiation or rite of passage
When a group with psychological warfare expertise targets a victim and tries to create situations, street theatre, scenarios, or events with the intention of embarrassing, humiliating, threaten, anger, induce fear, or other harmful effects they need a strategy to deal with the failure or failures if the events in question do not produce the desired outcome or result.
A failure of a group who tries to intentionally attack or humiliate a victim builds confidence in the victim for overcoming this challenge or properly dealing with the event in question, so there is a need to have a strategy or tactic to eliminate or reduce the confidence building phenomenon that results as much as possible. One of the ways this is done is by trying to make the victim believe the false view on reality or interpretation that it was a test, a training situation, and that there was or may have been some kind of benevolent intention in this kind of actions or scenario
One example for this strategy or tactic is to interpret the events as a test, the result is that the victim feels he is on a never ending test since these situations, events, and attacks are usually repetitive in this kind of on going psychological harassment or psychological war. Many of these tactics can also be considered to be psychological torture or used for psychological torture
A tactic that is sometimes used to make a victim feel vulnerable or more threatened, is to be threatened in some way and have the perpetrator stand directly behind them and out of view. Instinctively you would not want someone that is hostile towards you to stand directly behind you and out of view whether you feel threatened by the threats that were made or not.
You may have also noticed that when a person is hostile towards you and acts aggressively by thrashing or hitting objects it can trigger more of the fight-or-flight response from you. A similar tactic to the first, is for a person that is hostile towards you to motion an object towards you, towards your face, or to be in or come into "your space".
Staring drills are used to intimidate, provoke, make a person aggressive, and to destabilize victims.
It's linked to manipulation, credibility, and justification.
One technique is to simply stare at the victim and another is to whisper "you're scared" and engage in staring contests
Some people may worry or have stress about who they believe they can dominate or dominate and who they may or may not dominate. The word or metaphors "alpha male", as in wolf a pack, is also often used to describe a leader or someone in a leadership position. People in the workplace or in a relationship may continually try to dominate each other causing conflicts and tensions.
Domination can also be used as or in a psychological construction where a lot of importance is placed on who you dominate and this can result in a lot of stress and difficulties for people who think in terms of domination or have the "domination thing" in their head.
To remove this psychological construction or view on reality, you can simply view domination as 'you do not dominate anyone and no one dominates you'. In the workplace, positions should be clearly defined as having authority or a leadership role. Employees need to fulfill their obligations as employees and when people are in a relation, the relationship is supposed to be based on teamwork and usually does not involve one partner having authority over the other
Individuals can use words, actions, and sounds that will make a target recall memories associated to a specific event. Observers can note different reactions from the target such as fear, surprise, embarrassment (red face), anger, and different emotions. From these reactions the observers can obtain clues to the level of involvement or knowledge that the target may have about a certain event.
A simple example of this is if the targeted individual was involved in an event that has a specific location. The group can say the name of the location, like a street name. If the target does not associate this to anything or any memories, he will disregard the comments of strangers and have no reaction. If, however, the target does associate it to something, he may, or may not, have different reactions.
This scenario maybe repeated several times with different association pointers to get a better view or result. Like taking many measurements and obtaining some kind of average or again, a better view.
This psychological manipulation scenario can also be used to stress, or panic, a target. And a possible motive would be to have them use some kind of telecommunication device, that the target believes to be secure, and to possibly push the target to communicate to a partner, that may also be involved in the event, where he would discuss the strange phenomenon that he believes is happening to him or discuss the events in question. It’s a fact that in the US, Canada, and the UK there are secret organizations that listen to all telecommunications in these countries and that they also share information among themselves. Many people also believe that these organizations share information with other organization indirectly or through indirect channels.
There are many possible psychological manipulation type scenarios that can involve the use of sensitive information or dark secrets. You may have seen a movie where the “bad guy” says something like “get me some dirt on this guy”. The information would be used to intimidate the target or induce fear, stress, and paranoia. This type of scenario can easily fall into the classification of black mail where the target is in a catch 22 situation. The target would have to reveal the sensitive information or dark secrets to law enforcement in order to obtain some kind of help or assistance. His claims could also simply be dismissed as paranoia or delusions. And even if his claims would happen to be believed, there simply would be no proof or evidence.
Psychological warfare or using psychiatry in strong arm tactics is not a new phenomenon and it usually involves discrediting the target or having them declared psychologically ill. These tactics and technologies are usually used by powerful organizations. An example of this can be seen in the movie blue sky, set in the 1950’s, where the army uses psychiatry to hospitalize and medicate the target
• Discredit or destroy the victims credibility.
• Conceal psychological warfare knowledge.
• Eliminate the victim's means of subsistence or resources.
Psychological Warfare: Some Identified Weapons
• Psychiatry to attack the psychological integrity and credibility of victims.
• The weapon of degrading themes or pedophilia to use as a threat or to prevent exposure.
• The weapon of high levels of stress and sleep deprivation.
• The weapon of homelessness or eliminating a persons means of subsistence and financial resources.
When psychiatry attacks the victim's psychological integrity and credibility it makes the victim more vulnerable to the phenomenon or crime of criminal harassment or psychological warfare and it also conceals the related knowledge.
High levels of sleep deprivation can lead to macromineral deficiencies and acid-base disorders that can result in serious illnesses and even death.
High levels of sleep deprivation can also be used to overwhelm the victims body and lead to cancer.
Psychological warfare is an invisible technology that deals with the mind and destroying the victim’s credibility in order to prevent exposure is a top priority. Destroying the victim’s credibility also results in feelings or the belief of hopelessness.
Advanced technology and psychological manipulation are also used to make the victim’s claims more unbelievable or to make dismissing these claims easier or more justified.
When a group or an organization engages in psychological harassment or warfare they usually use tactics or operate in a way to discredit the victim or have the victim discredited by the medical community, notably psychiatry. Campaigns of disinformation or false information and information restrictions or isolation are usually used as well
If psychiatry and psychologist claim that psychological warfare does not exist, who is qualified to contradict them or to say differently.
Over the years and decades qualified medical professionals, notably psychiatrists, and psychologist have been telling victims that psychological harassment and psychological warfare do not exist, and the victims were subsequently labeled as mentally ill. The phenomenon and its effects on victims was not documented given the fact that it was said not to exist and actually said to be a medical or mental disorder. The phenomenon of psychological harassment and psychological warfare was explained or interpreted in terms of the victim being ill and delusional instead of being a victim of this phenomenon.
With the power of the internet and websites such as this one, the denial of the existence of this phenomenon is probably quickly changing given the fact that it creates a problem or dilemma for the medical community or medical professionals that would continue this practice
As powerful as some bullies and criminals may be, just like the common or regular bully and criminal they fear the light and exposure.
Psychological Warfare: Powerful Organizations and Secrets
When powerful organizations are willing to kill you and other people to preserve its secrets and prevent exposure, you need to share that secret with the whole world.
It reduces the value of targeting you or the value of your death.
• Many organizations, including psychiatry, claim that psychological warfare does not exist and some powerful organizations are willing to kill in order to preserve this knowledge and to prevent exposure.
• This knowledge has been used to drive people to homelessness, suicide, and to cause death through high levels of stress and sleep deprivation.
It's called crimes against humanity and society which is another very good reason to want to prevent exposure
Action -> Interpretation -> Re-enforce Interpretation : attack or threat -> interpretation of event or reaction -> re-enforce interpretation
• attack: a psychological attack or threat to get the fight-or-flight response.
• interpret reaction: the fight-or-flight response or adrenaline is interpreted as being fear "you're scared".
• re-enforce interpretation: "you were scared" or "you got scared".
Participants try to deceive or brainwash the victim into believing that to feel threatened, adrenaline, or the fight-or-flight response means fear.
Fear is used to attack the victim's honor and the victim's honor is threatened if he shows fear or if his enemy sees fear.
In other words, attempts are made to deceive or brainwash the victim into believing that the fight-or-flight response is fear because it can be easily induced through threats and interpreted as fear, to attack the victims honor and repetitive humiliation, and to use the fear-of-fear tactic.
Fear and the fight-or-flight response are two different things:
• fear is an emotion.
• the fight-or-flight response is a response to a threat
1- Shock, prep, and smoke screen.
Weird comments or discussions about sexuality, for example, will occur that can also have a shocking value by themselves. It's also used as a prep or smoke screen for what is to come or for what follows.
2- Insinuations
Insinuations that you belong to or are part of a selected group will be made. Ambiguous comments are usually used also. Ambiguities are usually used to induce doubt or uncertainty.
3- Indirect Threat
A threat will be made towards that selected group, which is an indirect threat towards you. Since you have been lead to believe that the people making these insinuations think you are a part of this group, it's a threat aimed at you. The desired result is that you feel threatened or fear.
4- Threats and Fear (preventing the victims from coming forward and exposing the perpetrators)
The victims of these tactics maybe reluctant to come forward because the threat was made towards a selected group and not directly at them. They may feel the effects of the threat, but may not understand the psychological manipulations behind them. The victim may not want to come forward when the threat was made towards homosexuals, for example, and that they are unable to explain why they feel or felt threatened. The victim may also believe that they will not be believed given the fact that the documentation about these psychological technologies do not exist or cannot be found. Psychiatry may also be involved and used as a threat in the sense of building false profiles for false accusations
Personal or sensitive information can also be used to humiliate or threaten a person. Personal or sensitive information that is shared with a friend or others can be used to humiliate the person when the relationship ends or takes a turn for the worst. People can also feel vulnerable when they believe that some of their personal or sensitive information may be shared with others. This is also part of a psychological manipulation tactic where the victim is threatened or attacked with subtle remarks to destabilize them