Trying to get bank account number AGAIN!!
Complaint
Ann
Country: United States
My mother just received another unsolicited phone call from a company called "First Consumer"--when I dialed that number last night is what the machine said, I just called now and the message said Fraud Watch?!
I think it may be tied in to her money fraud from InterBen as they have all of her information.
They acted like they were going to give her back some of the money that they electronically took out of her bank account--they even went so far as to give her a case file number. This company uses the amount of $279.00 with the calls that they make according to my Mom's experience and what I have found about them on the internet.
The number they gave her to call is 855-649-0679.
I think it may be tied in to her money fraud from InterBen as they have all of her information.
They acted like they were going to give her back some of the money that they electronically took out of her bank account--they even went so far as to give her a case file number. This company uses the amount of $279.00 with the calls that they make according to my Mom's experience and what I have found about them on the internet.
The number they gave her to call is 855-649-0679.
Comments
That type of telemarketing has often involved deceptive misrepresentations, including faking of recorded calls.
The Canadian "business directory" scams do it all the time, and the Canadian "discount medical card" scams do also.
Reported patterns in this scam match several characteristics of the Canadian medical card scams, suggesting that it's being run by someone who got their experience there, or possibly even from a Canadian call center (probably in the Montreal area). For example, they also use "remotely created checks" and ACH charges against checking account numbers as their preferred money grabbing path, rather than asking for credit or debit cards.
Doctoring recordings is real easy to do, and it's real common with fraudulent telemarketers. It works pretty well for fooling bank investigators who have never see blatant fraud before, because it creates the appearance of a "legitimate" transaction to go along with the appearance of a "product" (the alleged "service"), and it costs them NOTHING if you don't buy it. The game is get the account number by any means, and if challenged, throw sh*t at you and hope you believe it If not, oh well, go con the next sucker. Keep that money flowing.
You may have heard one recording, and it may even have had the victim providing their account number, but there is no way to know if the sales pitch you heard was the same sales pitch the victim heard.
Who's going to agree to some unknown service from some unknown company, costing $400? No problem! A common switcheroo is to say "there is no obligation, this is just a free trial, and you can cancel at any time", or "we'll just send you an information packet", then make sure there is no way they can cancel, maybe the cancellation information is in the "information packet", which never arives, or looks as close to junk mail as they can make it. They could have been told a line of BS like this, and their responses could have been edited into an entirely different sales script "agreeing" to a sale and the charges for it.
You would never know the difference, and with an elderly customer, maybe even one easily confused, you will just go along and hand over the money.
You're as much of a sucker as your customer.
Look op AG actions and class action lawsuits against Bank of America, Citi, Chase, Discover, etc.
They handed over access to customer accounts for setting up monthly charges, then the telemarketers were incentivized to "sell". Then came all the fraud, including faked recordings, some supposedly to people who were on vacation when they were recorded "agreeing". They wre caught red handed, but it still goes on.
https://complaintwire.org/~sys~/post/reply.aspx/KwAAADnIkhQoTrMFhjiTJLlXswU
Interesting to see this "Fraud Watch" linked to fraudulent InterBen charges.
There is a long history of fraudulent telemarketing targeted at seniors originating from the Montreal Canada area, purportedly selling "medical discount plans", most recently reported to show charges under the name InterBen.
Also interesting to see it linked to the fraudulent SplendorConcepts charges.
No one has yet reported a connection between the SplendorConcepts charges and an actual telemarketing call, yet the people targeted include a high percentage of the eldeerly, similar to the InterBen fraud.
Common connection to this phony "Fraud Watch" ties SplendorConcepts fraud to the earlier InterBen fraud.
All three are probably cross border fraud coming from Montreal Canada.
Contact FTC, the Illinios AG, and RCMP.
BBB report on Discount Medical Benefits, rated "F":
http://www.bbb.org/upstate-new-york/business- ... in-ny-235963730
Discount Medical Benefits
Phone: (866) 304-2401
1176 A Main St, Champlain , NY 12919
BBB report on Discount Medical Services, rated "F":
http://www.bbb.org/upstate-new-york/business- ... in-ny-165454830
Discount Medical Benefits
Phone: (866) 304-2401
1176 A Main St, Champlain , NY 12919
BBB report on InterBen Med, rated "F":
Mail reportedly returned undeliverable.
http://www.bbb.org/upstate-new-york/business- ... in-ny-235967188
Interben Med
100 Walnut St Suite 1051, Champlain, NY 12919
BBB report on Splendor Concepts, rated "F":
Website pitches some mortgage reduction educational product, yet all consumer complaints report fraudulent charges with no prior contact.
http://www.bbb.org/chicago/business-reviews/m ... 0259/complaints
Splendor Concepts
(866) 775-4392
161 N Clark St Ste 4700, Chicago, IL 60601-3201
Failed to respond to complaint.
http://www.bbb.org/chicago/business-reviews/f ... ago-il-88480146
First Consumers Fraud Watch
53 W Jackson Blvd Ste 635, Chicago, IL 60604-3455
BBB reports a number of businesses with the name "Fraud Watch", including seveal where mail was returned, and one with a Champlain NY mail drop. Many appear to be (or to have once been) "credit card fraud protection" fraudulent telemarketing scams.
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/ceeOFGIHswU/spendor-concepts
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/7ngB4sMMcQU/first-consumers-fraud-watch
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/G7pQcQYYpgU/splendor-concepts-webpayment
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/NYpVy7tpngU/splendor-concepts-webpayment
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/_fg7jbCDwQU/splendor-concepts
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/OciSFChOswU/splendor-concepts
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/GruP3KETswU/splendor-concepts-webpayment
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/UTpjPZTjxQU/splendor-concepts
Recent predatory telemarketing complaint:
https://complaintwire.org/complaint/yERlxTACxgU/i-just-do-not-want-this-card
https://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-855-649-0679
Account name: Olorunmodimu Tinuola.
Account number: 3027593883
Bank name: First bank of Nigeria
Here is the mobile number that he as be using to contact me: 8171882938. And this person to me that is a youth coups serving in Benue state
Best regards
Bright
In the "fraud industry" this is known as "reloading": call some sucker who fell for an earlier scam, and scam them again, "to get it back". This is particularly common with scams targeted at the elderly.
And how, exactly, did they end up with her name? ESP? Not likely.
Sounds like your mom is either being swindled by the same scammers as earler, or they have sold her name on a "sucker list".
What fraud did your mom get swindled by earlier?
Thank goodness my grandmother is a smart cookie and didn't give them any information!
WHAT A BUNCH OF FREAKIN' LOSERS!
Your grandmother was being targeted for some reason, and in some cases that may mean her name is being sold by other fraudulent telemarketers on some "sucker list". Some of those lists are (illegally) being sold complete with bank account information, allowing deceptive telemarketers to be even more deceptive in their "sales calls", since they don't even have to elicit disclosure of full account information to run through charges, so the victim might not be tipped off. They are just looking for enough of a recording that they can falsely claim is a charge authorization, even if it doesn't meet FTC TSR rules.
Con her, con you, con your bank, it's all the same game.